Political Writing · Foreign Policy

Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress

The emergence over the past decade of intensified U.S. competition with the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) and the Russian Federation (Russia)—often referred to as great power competition (GPC) o

Congressional Research Service· Library of Congress · January 21, 2015 · 3 min

Authorized reading. Congressional Research Service, Congressional Research Service. Public domain (U.S. government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105) View original source →

The emergence over the past decade of intensified U.S. competition with the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) and the Russian Federation (Russia)—often referred to as great power competition (GPC) or strategic competition—has profoundly changed the conversation about U.S. defense issues from what it was during the post–Cold War era: Counterterrorist operations and U.S. military operations in the Middle East—which had been more at the center of discussions of U.S. defense issues following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001—are now a less prominent (but still present) element in the conversation, and the conversation now focuses more on the following elements, all of which relate largely to China and/or Russia:

• grand strategy and geopolitics as a starting point for discussing U.S. defense issues;

• the force-planning standard, meaning the number and types of simultaneous or overlapping conflicts or other contingencies that the U.S. military should be sized to be able to conduct—a planning factor that can strongly impact the size of the U.S. defense budget;

• supply chain security, meaning awareness and minimization of reliance in U.S. military systems on components, subcomponents, materials, and software from non-allied countries, particularly China and Russia; and

The issue for Congress is how U.S. defense planning and budgeting should respond to GPC and whether to approve, reject, or modify the Biden Administration’s defense strategy and proposed funding levels, plans, and programs for addressing GPC. Congress’s decisions on these issues could have significant implications for U.S. defense capabilities and funding requirements and the U.S. defense industrial base.

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1

Great Power Competition .......................................................................................................... 1

Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1

Obama Administration and Trump Administration Strategy Documents ........................... 2 Biden Administration October 2022 National Security Strategy ........................................ 2

Original author: Congressional Research Service
Original source: Congressional Research Service
Public domain (U.S. government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
View original →

Now talk about it.

Debate this issue

Should the United States maintain its current level of commitment to NATO?

Discussion

A conversation room. You do not need to get published.

No discussion yet.

Create an account to reply or like.

Submit your own writing