Political Writing · Elections
Donor Disclosure: 501(c) Groups and Campaign Spending
has, in the courts concerning this specific case—which is beyond the scope of this CRS product—the policy
Congressional Research Service· Library of Congress · October 18, 2018 · 3 min
Authorized reading. Congressional Research Service, Congressional Research Service. Public domain (U.S. government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105) View original source →
has, in the courts concerning this specific case—which is beyond the scope of this CRS product—the policy
entities regulated under campaign finance law and tax law, which is essential to understanding donor disclosure.
Independent Spending in 2012 Race The disclosure and spending in question originated in the
super political action committee (super PAC) American Crossroads, Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies (Crossroads GPS) is a tax-exempt group regulated under §501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Crossroads GPS reported making more than $6 million in independent expenditures (IEs) calling for election or defeat of candidates in the Ohio contest. It reported no donors for those IEs in its FEC reports.
purposes of this discussion, CREW v. FEC addresses whether tax-exempt organizations that are only partially
committees are regulated under IRC §527 for tax purposes. IRC §527 is unessential for this discussion.)
Crossroads GPS is organized under §501(c)(4) of the IRC as a social welfare group . Similar provisions apply to
that they could expressly advocate election or defeat of federal candidates through independent expenditures like
District Court ruling chills their political speech and that they will curtail or refrain from making their planned IEs.
candidates through at least $250 per calendar year in IEs, however, FECA requires identifying donors who gave at
IEs. Third, rather than explicitly calling for election or defeat of federal candidates, groups could shift their
return (form 990). Donor information is redacted from public versions of these reports. The IRS announced in July
Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
Original author: Congressional Research Service
Original source: Congressional Research Service
Public domain (U.S. government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
View original →
Now talk about it.
Debate this issue
Should voters be required to show photo ID in federal elections?
Discussion
A conversation room. You do not need to get published.
No discussion yet.
Create an account to reply or like.